Guest wrote:Illen A Cluf wrote:
However, in my opinion, the real test is not how the expression, in isolation, can be interpreted, but in how Fulcanelli, for example, actually uses the term in the context of his discussion.
Since it has already been definitely decided, I do not wish to add further to that particular discussion. I'll just agree to disagree.
The thing is, how he
actually uses the term is not definitive and is thus left to interpretation.
I'm also sure that I did say that my interpretation was my own opinion and so the issue can't be called
definitive, but fair enough, it would have been nice to hear your take on the matter.
Again, welcome back.
Thank you. I may come back to that later. I'm currently trying to resolve a few contradictions in the text, and once I resolve those, I'll feel much more comfortable in my interpretations.